Don’t blame us, blame him

By Matthew JC Powell on Sep 7, 2010 11:29 AM
Filed under Mobility

Apple’s decision to fire an employee involved in designing the latest iPhone will whip up the sceptics.

On the 24th of June, Apple Inc released iPhone 4, with radio antennas for Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, 3G and so forth incorporated in the steel frame of the phone itself. Within a few days, as you may have heard, people started noticing that under certain circumstances if you held the phone a certain way you could lose the 3G signal. Over the next few weeks this blew up into a maelstrom that has become known as "Antennagate".

You know all that

On the 16th of July, Steve Jobs and key Apple executives held a press conference to demonstrate that the antenna's performance wasn't that big of a problem and offer free rubber bumpers to stop you actually touching the antenna and thus alleviate the problem.They made much of the highly skilled engineers at Apple and the millions upon millions of dollars it had spent developing state-of-the-art testing facilities. So when Steve says there's no problem, you believe him, right?

Of course. That's why that was the last anyone heard of it

Oh, except that on the 7th of August, Apple announced Mark Papermaster had departed the company because of "broad cultural incompatibility". Mark Papermaster? At Apple he was senior vice president of devices hardware engineering, reporting directly to the CEO. More than any other individual, he was responsible for the design of the iPhone 4's antenna and for convincing Steve Jobs there wasn't a problem with it.

Hmmm

Looking back to July, he was not one of the key Apple execs who fronted the press, despite the fact that he's probably the guy who knew the most about it. He was notable in his absence.

Hmmm

If I wanted to project an image of everything being all right Jack at Apple, I can't help feeling I'd have held off firing Mark Papermaster for a little bit. If he was broadly incompatible with the culture (whatever that means), then move him, assign him to the Siberian office, but don't fire him until the whole antenna thing blows over.At every step, Apple seems to have been determined to get the maximum bad press out of the iPhone antenna.

Firing Papermaster gets it back into the news again (to wit, this) right when it should have gone away.When the departure was announced, I observed on Twitter that I hoped Papermaster had not been fired over the antenna, because "it's a PR issue not an engineering issue".

I was jumped on by people claiming it as an engineering issue, the antenna design was stupid, there's no way you can put an antenna into a steel frame that people hold and expect it to work - it can't be done and anyone who says otherwise is a ninny. Well, I continued to stand by my ninnitude, and here's why: the iPhone 4's antenna works.

Yep, if I'm in a bad signal area and I try really hard I can drop a bar or two - but in a good signal area, no way. In addition, the Wi-Fi antenna is also incorporated into the same steel frame and the iPhone 4 is markedly better for Wi-Fi than the iPhone 3GS. The antenna works. Honest. When I first heard that the antenna was incorporated into the steel frame I thought "how in the world can they do that?" It seemed unlikely to me. To people who know more than I do about antennas, it seemed impossible.Thing is, though, engineers get paid to look at impossible problems and solve them. I can safely say that pretty much every engineer I have ever met is smarter than I am. I have no idea how you'd wrap an antenna in steel and expect it to work, but Mark Papermaster and his team went and did it. I also haven't the foggiest idea how to build a single-span arch bridge across Sydney Harbour using only the technology available in the 1920s, but if you show me a functioning example I'll take your word it can be done.

There are people in the world who believe that human beings could not possibly have walked on the Moon, simply because they themselves don't know how to do such a thing. 

Many of them seem to have Twitter accounts

But I digress. If Apple's response to claims that the iPhone 4 antenna is a fundamentally flawed design is "no it isn't" then the departure of Mark Papermaster could not have been worse timed. The bloggers and conspiracy theorists who claim that Apple knew there was a problem feel vindicated and therefore even angrier about the "there's no problem" press conference. Now they're seething and lying in wait for the next Apple gaffe, real or imagined, to pounce upon. Honestly, Siberia would have been the smarter option.

Matthew JC. Powell can be reached on his new iPhone 4. Go on, try emailing him at mjcp@me.com - he'll get it. 

 
Follow us on Facebook and Twitter
 

Copyright © CRN Australia. All rights reserved.

Don’t blame us, blame him
 
This article appeared in the September issue of CRN.

 
 
 
 
Top Stories
Icahn throws down the gauntlet to Dell
Has purchased half of partner's shares.
 
IBM layoffs said to be widespread
Worldwide reduction.
 
 
Sign up to receive CRN email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...
Latest Comments
Polls
Is your business doing as well now as it was at this time last year?


   |   View results
Yes
  32%
 
No
  54%
 
The same
  14%
TOTAL VOTES: 492

Vote now
CRN Magazine

Issue: 316 | July 2013

CRN Magazine looks in-depth at the emerging issues and developments for the channel, and provides insight, analysis and strategic information to help resellers better run their businesses.