BigPond redirects typos to 'unethical' branded search page

By Josh Mehlman on Nov 20, 2009 12:00 AM
Filed under Communications

Customers presented with advertisements, paid links and search results instead of error message.

Telstra has begun redirecting failed domain name lookups on its BigPond broadband network to a Telstra-branded search page which includes advertisements and pay-per-click links.

Telstra has already rolled out this system for BigPond broadband customers in Queensland with other states to follow by mid-December. Optus had adopted a similar strategy last month, much to the ire of some of its subscribers.

In an email sent to customers, Telstra emphasised the convenience of the new service.

"BigPond Broadband customers from today will experience less keyboard anguish with our new DNS redirection application. Typos can happen at any time. It's frustrating when you get an MS Internet Explorer Live Search page with suggestions from a mistyped URL. It's even more annoying when you get an unfriendly "404" page error message," the letter said.

"The BigPond-branded landing page provides BigPond customers with organic search results, sponsored links, display advertisements and intelligent recommendations, all derived from the invalid domain input - much more helpful and friendly than a nasty 404 page error."

click to view full size image

BigPond cable customer Dave Baker, a Gold Coast-based web designer at BlueTeddy, noticed the changes yesterday.

"As a tech person it didn't really faze me - when I hit the wrong URL and saw a fat BigPond/Telstra logo my first thought was 'typical'," he said. "To their credit they haven't covered the first page with advertising like other ISPs have done - but as soon as you click one of the links on a page I'm sure somebody makes some money.

"This opens the door for hijacking and other issues, which are already present in any ISP, but made more possible by introducing third-party software to intercept DNS requests."

Telstra also allows users to opt out of the redirection service, he added.

Matt Moor, Senior Architect at hosting company Bulletproof Networks believes the redirection system is "unethical" and "contravenes the spirit of the DNS system".

"If you posted a letter at your local post office, but got the address wrong, would you expect the postal service to send you back a load of advertising, and no clear indication of what went wrong? It is important for users to see an error message - not advertising - so that they can realise and correct their mistake.

"We host DNS records for all our major clients and would not even contemplate this sort of unethical and technically improper behaviour."

However, Brett Fenton, Chief Operating Officer at domain name and hosting company Netregistry, warns against hyperbolic claims that Telstra's change could break the domain name system. Because it only affects BigPond customers, it is not comparable to 'wildcard' redirects, which affect all domain name requests under a particular domain such as .com or .net, he said.

"People have this perception of DNS being a shared public resource - they don't like the fact that one company had the ability to abuse that to their own ends," he said. "But the ISP is providing users access to their DNS servers as a paid service and saying, 'If it's a failed lookup, we want to present you with more information'.

"The tech guys are always going to be pretty vocal about that, saying they're not following the rules. Any break in convention or standard protocols, the techies will jump up and down about it. They're generally the people who resist any change towards commercialisation of the internet.

"But for the Joe Average user, if a failed DNS resolution was giving them search results in Google, most people would see that as useful, not a negative thing."

Telstra BigPond did not respond to our request for comment.

What do you think of Telstra's 404 error strategy? Is it in the right spirit of the Internet? Comment below...

 
Follow us on Facebook and Twitter
 
BigPond redirects typos to 'unethical' branded search page
"Two things wrong with this - one, it's not 404's but rather nxdomains, and two (more importantly) - one of the most common basic checks used to block spammers is to check that the domain they're ..."
 
 
 
 
Comments: 10
Maria
Nov 20, 2009 8:15 AM
I guess I am a techo...I would rather see the error message.
In the same vein, it would be nice to know that Cookies must be enabled, ie those sites requiring them should catch when Cookies are disabled and issue an error for that too
johnpro2
Nov 20, 2009 8:26 AM
When I typo in Google I get redirected to Microsoft Bing search.

I find this to be tricky in the same way as Telstra redirects...This redirect to Bing would possibly explain MS claimed rise in Bing usage?

Jp
Brisbane
Ant
Nov 20, 2009 11:14 AM
"a nasty 404 page error." has not got anything to do with failed DNS lookups. It show a misunderstanding of the technology which BigPond are claiming to offer, and is confusing to the consumer, who will continue to get 404 errors even with this feature enabled.
nicstav
Nov 20, 2009 1:50 PM
Good on Bigpond for monetising this dead page.
There is nothing wrong with Bigpond Optus, or any other isp presenting sponsored listings on a 404 page.

Stop your whining Australians.. this is such tall poppy syndrome.
udha
Nov 20, 2009 6:16 PM
"What do you think of Telstra's 404 error strategy? Is it in the right spirit of the Internet? Comment below..."

This is not going to change a single 404 error. DNS resolves and points to a website, then that website will return a success along with the requested content, or an error to say the page or file was not found (404). This is AFTER the DNS query, and can never be 'solved' with DNS, not that it needs a solution, it's working as intended.

This will see that you have asked for a website that doesn't exist, which is not a 404 error, it's just a Server Not Found issue, and it is clear you have been mistaken. Someone who comes to rely in this non-standard feature of Bigponds is only hurting themselves if they ever need to choose another provider, suddenly their broken way of surfing won't work.
udha
Nov 20, 2009 6:23 PM
Also to nicstav, firstly, you are wrong about sponsored listings on a 404 page, but if you were correct, there is a lot wrong with it. Just because you don't use the received 404 response for anything, doesn't mean that the computer doesn't. A web server's status response means far more than you realize, and when tampered with problems are sure to follow.
worlddomain
Nov 21, 2009 12:54 AM
This is all well and fine for human users of the web. But what of software it will no longer experieince resolution failers on Bigpond accounts.
SP
Nov 21, 2009 10:47 AM
South Aus here, and after checking that it is doing it (and it does) I immediately seeked out the Opt-Out page.

For various reasons already mentioned here, I'm not going to allow it to show on my PC.
peterh_oz
Nov 24, 2009 1:14 AM
Who cares?

This is not news.
Freman
Nov 24, 2009 10:27 AM
Two things wrong with this - one, it's not 404's but rather nxdomains, and two (more importantly) - one of the most common basic checks used to block spammers is to check that the domain they're sending from exists - now tesltra's domain servers return results for nxdomains...
Comments have been disabled for this article.
 
 
Top Stories
Icahn throws down the gauntlet to Dell
Has purchased half of partner's shares.
 
IBM layoffs said to be widespread
Worldwide reduction.
 
 
Sign up to receive CRN email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...
Latest Comments
Polls
Is your business doing as well now as it was at this time last year?


   |   View results
Yes
  32%
 
No
  54%
 
The same
  14%
TOTAL VOTES: 492

Vote now
CRN Magazine

Issue: 316 | July 2013

CRN Magazine looks in-depth at the emerging issues and developments for the channel, and provides insight, analysis and strategic information to help resellers better run their businesses.