Reaction: Channel cautiously optimistic about iPad

By Negar Salek, Lilia Guan, Nate Cochrane
Jan 29, 2010 3:47 PM
Tags: tablet | apple | ipad | iphone | touch | slate | netbook

The channel sizes up Apple's tablet.

Apple's iPad was likely the worst-kept secret in recent history with many of its features leaked or speculated in the months leading up to its launch. Tablets are not a new category and neither are smart phones, so we asked three resellers with long histories in these categories what they think about the shiny new toy and how their customers will respond to it?

Neil Hancock, managing director, Portacom, Perth, WA

How does the iPad fit with niches in your business?
We have never seen large tablet interest. Originally, when tablet products first came out, they were very similar to the design of the Apple iPad. They proved too much of a niche product and were relegated to specific industries in small numbers.
To try and improve the acceptance of the tablet, an integrated keyboard was added, making the unit look and function similarly to that of a notebook computer. This was more successful but still not a major product.
We will try and sell the Apple and I hope it is a winner but historically, the tablet was not a major success.

What price would you like to see the entry-level, 16GB model pitched into?
$999 would be the right starting price to be a success.

What are some of the caveats about the device, restrictions on its use, and what do you think it will do well?
There is a difference between a touch screen and a tablet screen. The Tablet screen usually allows for the use of a stylus for handwriting entry. Until I physically see and use the iPad, I reserve judgement here.
The speed of the device becomes more important as the unit gets bigger - I hope the CPU is fast enough for Tablet use.
It looks like a giant iPhone.
It should be a success if they can get the appropriate content and pricing right.

 

Ted Markstein, owner, Userland Australia, Katoomba NSW

How does the iPad fit with niches in your business?
It's a game changing product it will sell, probably at the same sort of volumes as the iPhone. It allows anybody in education to have their entire reference library accessible without having to lug books around. It's an enormously potent education tool and I would expect it will cause a revolution - not before time - in printing. And all the people that rely on paper in selling classified ads will have to work out some better way of peddling their ads.

Is the price range suitable for your business?
What I didn't expect was that they would pitch it at such a low price initially. I didn't expect it under US$500. It's outstandingly cheap. The other thing I didn't expect and I'm interested in seeing how they'll release the second version with 3G unlocked - as is will have a major tilt at the phone [companies]. And it's about time.

Implications?
This is not something to just read books with, this is carrying a library. This means that if you're doing research and tech teaching, your references are available electronically, which means you can go from one book to another without having to carry anything. Students in schools aren't going to need textbooks - that's the clear implication of this device. This is clearly obviously going to happen - if the books aren't available here it's only a matter of time to clearing the mechanism by which they'll be delivered.

 

Hugo Ortega, principal of Tegatech (PC tablet distributor)

What does the iPad mean to your business and that of your customers?
I think it will propel us into the commercial space, although the [Apple] tablet released isn't the greatest. There are better PC tablets out in the market and that's purely based on specifications.
An organisation's decision to use an iPad will come down to the increased cost in software development. Firstly, the cost of developing an application that sits on the iPad and the synchronisation story - getting information off the iPad and on to their network. With a PC tablet you can take the desktop software install it straight on to a mobile PC and make it mobile immediately without any further development cost.

What are some caveats of the iPad? 
Sexy and refined as it is there will be a learning curve and infrastructure expense curve around getting involved with an iPad. HTC outsold the iPhone for many months in Australia; the iPhone was a resounding success but not the death of all smartphone manufacturers. 
There are a few features that will make it hard for business users: no USB so users will have to synchronise to Bluetooth or Wi-Fi, reducing battery life (and the concealed battery is a worry because if it breaks down you have to send it away for replacement). There's a lack of cameras - mobile PCs have two cameras. The touchpad is finger-only and you can't use a stylus on a comparative touch screen.  

What are the device's prospects?
Tablets were developed for mobile use- more so than a notebook - it's an all in-one machine on the road. The iPad will sell well because it's sexy but the lack of functions needs to be revised.
It also incorporates the new A4 processor, which could work well or could crumble.
My opinion is based on tablet specification alone. The iPad is the perfect portal to Apple's three main generators: iTunes, Apps and iBooks. Apple didn't set out to make a perfect tablet but a portal for those three.

And for business users?
Enterprise and medium businesses will struggle to adopt the iPad, with much stronger offerings in the PC space. You don't have to favour PCs, Apple bloggers are also disappointed. Tegatech will stay loyal to PC tablets unless there's a drive from resellers. The bleeding-edge resellers are calling to enquire but there's no groundswell from bread-and-butter resellers. The iPad has a long way to go; it's Apple's first chance and maybe the third generation will be perfect.

Do you have an opinion on the iPad? Does the lack of multitasking and Adobe Flash or a camera inhibit its adoption in the enterprise and with consumers? Or will its sleek sophistication win over the naysayers as the iPhone did? Don't let the conversation end here, sound off below.

  • Email a Friend
  • Print Page
Reaction: Channel cautiously optimistic about iPad
"nate, apple wasn't the only vendor to opt out of legacy connectors for a while there. Compaq, IBM and HP also had "legacy free" devices, the only connectors were usb and a monitor, no parallel, no ..."
 
 
 


Comments: 5
Thoughts on this article? Add a comment below.
natecochrane
Jan 29, 2010 4:16 PM
The lack of a camera is a killer: I was really hoping to be able to mobile videoconference with this. I seldom use Flash but many e-magazine readers require it, which seems to dint the device's push into this area. And I had hoped for better camera integration, especially with high-end DSLRs -- this could have been a pro photographer's essential bit of kit.

The encased battery is also a pain; I want to keep going on the road or a plane and swap out the battery as needed.

But for all its shortcomings, the access to all the apps I love such as Air Video, ABC, Echofon and Wikipanion mean this is still quite attractive. And no one could complain about the price, likely to be $549 to $599 at RRP.
plhau98
Feb 1, 2010 2:31 PM
The ipad will have a dock connector - to a USB cable and a connection to a PC or mac - data transfer problem sorted. Hugo from tegatech mentioned lack of USB ports, but this isn't a notebook or desktop replacement, it is aimed squarely at the netbook genre, and is designed to be easy to carry, easy to use and with the dock, easy to transfer information, the same as the iphone.
tabletpc
Feb 1, 2010 3:12 PM
Lol, yes we have an adapter for that... What are you going to do with that connector? What will it support? I doubt it will allow you to plug in your usb stick and copy files back and forth.

For example, Green energy assesors using touch screen tablets and netbooks currently take an excel spreadsheet provided by the government and fill out thier paperwork onsite. It's impossibly fiddly to even attempt on an iPhone... and it will be the same on the iPad. It has very few commercial applications due to the many things that it lacks. You can have a closed shop on a phone without much loss, but on a Tablet... it is pretty much useless.

Our verdict is wait for version 3. iPad V1 is for chumps...
natecochrane
Feb 3, 2010 9:24 AM
The lack of USB is classic Apple connector and port strategy. Anyone remember the funky printer interfaces they used to have on the original Macs? It means anyone who wants to connect to an Apple device has to do so on Apple's terms.
When Jobs came back he brought with him a commitment to COTS technology such as USB but it seems that still doesn't extend to the iPhone and iPad.
Apple also wants everyone to use its cloud service, MobileMe, rather than wander back and forth with thumb drives.
plhau98
Feb 4, 2010 1:28 PM
nate, apple wasn't the only vendor to opt out of legacy connectors for a while there. Compaq, IBM and HP also had "legacy free" devices, the only connectors were usb and a monitor, no parallel, no serial. who actually uses a serial interface any more? what about parallel? The funky apple printer connectors were out of the loop for, as I recall, a month. Then the accessory companies fired up with usb to parallel, usb to apple printer, usb to serial connectors, and the problem was solved. All we need is a ipad dock to usb / firewire connector, and that problem is solved as well.
Comment:
Want to participate in the discussion?
Or log in now to comment


Top Stories
A guided tour of Cisco's proof-of-concept centre
A data centre to test your customers' rigs.
 
Interview: Peter Kazacos and the "wild west" of IT
CRN talks to Hostech chairman and industry veteran, Peter Kazacos.
 
On the Move: March
Updated: Appointments and promotions.
 
Shortcutsall you need to know on...
  • How to run your business successfully 
  • NBN 
  • Windows 7 
  • Unified Communications 
  • Smart Power 
Latest Comments
"Informative post. thanks for the info shared here about the Cloud computing conference. Recently ..."
by shruthihr_80 Mar 20, 2010 10:37 PM
 
"Haha...What a sad little man JL must be. Whinges about the NBN now wants in on it, We don't want ..."
by firey1 Mar 20, 2010 4:56 PM
 
"Thanks Glen, I've made those corrections."
by sholtomacpherson Mar 19, 2010 10:33 AM
 
"This result is the law! It even applies to the small telco sellers in the mall of a shopping ..."
by peter Mar 18, 2010 9:10 PM
 
"Additionally, any small business with growth (and competition) on their mind would do well to ..."
by bld Mar 16, 2010 9:54 PM
Polls
Have you experienced a problem when returning faulty goods to online retailers?


   |   View results
Never
  36%
 
Only once
  18%
 
All the time
  45%
TOTAL VOTES: 11

Vote now
CRN Magazine

Issue: 277 | March, 2010

CRN Magazine looks in-depth at the emerging issues and developments for the Channel, and provides insight, analysis and strategic information to help resellers better run their businesses.