iiNet wins! Film industry's case torn to shreds

iiNet wins. Case dismissed. AFACT to pay.

The Federal Court of Australia has dismissed the film industry's case against iiNet, finding that Australia's No.3 internet provider did not authorise copyright infringement on its network.

The Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft representing the film industry, has been ordered to pay iiNet's costs. iiNet chief executive Michael Malone estimated that these costs add up to around $4 million.

"I find that iiNet simply can't be seen as approving infringement," said Justice Cowdroy.

Summarising a 200 page judgement, Justice Cowdroy found iiNet users had infringed copyright by downloading films on BitTorrent, but he found that the number of infringers was far less than alleged by AFACT.

More importantly, Justice Cowdroy said that the "mere provision of access to internet is not the means to infringement".

"Copyright infringement occured as result of use of BitTorrent, not the Internet," he said. "iiNet has no control over BitTorrent system and not responsible for BitTorrent system."

The fact worldwide piracy was rife "does not necessitate or compel a finding of authorisation, just because it is felt there is something that must be done", he said.

And he found that iiNet was "entitled to safe harbour" provisions because it had a policy on infringement, even if its policy didn't stand up to AFACT's standards.

iiNet CEO Michael Malone told iTnews he was "relieved".

"We are delighted with the result and largely just relieved that it is over," he said. "We welcome the outcome. We said from the beginning we did not believe we ever authorised copyright."

Malone said the case proved that AFACT's approach had "wasted a year" and not been constructive. He intends to now attempt to negotiate with film studios and other rights holders [video] to sell their content legitimately through the ISP's "freezone".

AFACT executive director Neil Gane said outside the court that the film industry is "very disappointed" with the judgement [see video]. He said the Federal Government cannot stand by and watch Australians infringe copyright "unabated".

"AFACT will spend the next few days deciding whether to appeal," he said. 

For live updates and comment click here: iiTrial: Judgement Day (live coverage).

 

  • Email a Friend
  • Print Page
iiNet wins! Film industry's case torn to shreds
View larger image View larger image View larger image
View Photo Gallery
"I totally agree. As has been said before the copyright holder would be better off to engage an IT person to assist in distribution of their product that the engagement of a lawyer to prohibit it."
 
 
 


Comments: 2
Thoughts on this article? Add a comment below.
karlmelrose
Feb 4, 2010 1:45 PM
Here's to capitalism, and the real thing that stops piracy - an access based business non-restrictive business model that makes sense, the money spent on the court case could have been spent provisioning new servers and making it so easy to buy a video on your PC that no one bothers pirating a DVD because the blank DVD costs half the price of just downloading the movie (written while downloading season 2 of the mentalist from ITUNES for $3/episode). Hopefully the movie industry will wake up like the music did and realise that if they advocate for access and broadband penetration, they'll make more money.
fagtatts
Feb 4, 2010 8:25 PM
I totally agree. As has been said before the copyright holder would be better off to engage an IT person to assist in distribution of their product that the engagement of a lawyer to prohibit it.
Comment:
Want to participate in the discussion?
Or log in now to comment


Top Stories
A guided tour of Cisco's proof-of-concept centre
A data centre to test your customers' rigs.
 
Interview: Peter Kazacos and the "wild west" of IT
CRN talks to Hostech chairman and industry veteran, Peter Kazacos.
 
On the Move: March
Updated: Appointments and promotions.
 
Shortcutsall you need to know on...
  • How to run your business successfully 
  • NBN 
  • Windows 7 
  • Unified Communications 
  • Smart Power 
Latest Comments
"Informative post. thanks for the info shared here about the Cloud computing conference. Recently ..."
by shruthihr_80 Mar 20, 2010 10:37 PM
 
"Haha...What a sad little man JL must be. Whinges about the NBN now wants in on it, We don't want ..."
by firey1 Mar 20, 2010 4:56 PM
 
"Thanks Glen, I've made those corrections."
by sholtomacpherson Mar 19, 2010 10:33 AM
 
"This result is the law! It even applies to the small telco sellers in the mall of a shopping ..."
by peter Mar 18, 2010 9:10 PM
 
"Additionally, any small business with growth (and competition) on their mind would do well to ..."
by bld Mar 16, 2010 9:54 PM
Polls
Have you experienced a problem when returning faulty goods to online retailers?


   |   View results
Never
  40%
 
Only once
  10%
 
All the time
  50%
TOTAL VOTES: 10

Vote now
CRN Magazine

Issue: 277 | March, 2010

CRN Magazine looks in-depth at the emerging issues and developments for the Channel, and provides insight, analysis and strategic information to help resellers better run their businesses.