Abbott "not a tech head" on broadband

By Ry Crozier on Aug 11, 2010 8:37 AM
Filed under Communications

Leaves the technical stuff to his Comms Minister.

Liberal Party leader Tony Abbott was last night unable to explain how the Coalition's broadband policy was technically possible, deferring questions on the subject because he was "no Bill Gates" and would lose a technical argument.

Appearing on the ABC's 7:30 Report, Abbott faced a well-prepared presenter Kerry O'Brien, who repeatedly sought basic information on how the Coalition would make good on its broadband promise of 12 Mbps peak speeds to most Australians.

"Just as the Prime Minister says, I say as well that I'm no Bill Gates here and I don't claim to be any kind of tech head in all of this," Abbott said.

"But we are going to have broadband running past 97 percent of households and, yes, we're not guaranteeing 100 megabits, but we are guaranteeing upwards to 100 megabits."

O'Brien grilled Abbott on his promise of "peak speeds", even explaining what they were to try and elicit a response from Abbott.

"Again, if you're gonna get me into a technical argument, I'm going to lose it, Kerry, because I'm not a tech head. But we are offering 12 and up and we think in the vast ...," Abbott began.

"Well... can you really give that guarantee when you don't seem to know what peak speed is," O'Brien responded.

"Well, Kerry, I take your point: that if you want to drag me into a technical discussion here, I'm not gonna be very successful at it," Abbott said.

 
Follow us on Facebook and Twitter
 

Copyright © iTnews.com.au . All rights reserved.

Abbott "not a tech head" on broadband
"State Rail.... Same diff really? All ex public service orgnisations that are heavliy process orintated and where there is no ownership of outcomes etc... but i digress... apploiges"
 
 
 
 
Comments: 15
johnpro2
Aug 11, 2010 8:46 AM
I agree at present the average home user possibly does not require 100mb/s ..however Bill Gates once argued to his embarrassment that more than 640KB of RAM was not necessary. Optimizing DSL has a limited future.
Jonbays
Aug 11, 2010 9:25 AM
I think this is the turning point where Tony lost the election. Internet censorship, illegal immigrants and the economy he could have won on but NBN is the one that lost it for him.
Ron Huttner
Aug 11, 2010 11:23 AM
Maybe not a "tech-head". But without a shadow of a doubt a d***head.

Edited by negarsalek: 11/8/2010 12:34:10 PM
gnome
Aug 11, 2010 11:31 AM

"we're offering 12 and up".

12 what? Leprechauns per fairy at the bottom of the garden?
saknightsy
Aug 11, 2010 12:11 PM
It would be unrealistic to think the election is based on who can build a bigger internet super highway, when the real answer is, can the tax payers afford to spend the money funding these super sized commitments and would you like fries with that (or do we mean bigger taxes and/or long term debt for Australia).

We’d all love to have fast unlimited internet at home, but to fund the investment from our own pocket through tax changes the game.

We need to keep a gage on what the real matter is, noting the National Broadband Network is the largest single infrastructure investment in Australia's history, which has “housing insulation” and “halls for schools” written all over it.

The geographic reality of population density in Australia has to play a part in the realm of reality for these scheme. We cannot afford to mark ourselves against countries like Japan and Korea whose population density can afford these programs in stark contrast to Australia’s small and wide spread population.

I’m tired to of hearing about over priced super promises and would prefer to hear about well balanced achievable measures that will not set our countries finances backwards.

Will the real solution provider please stand up... Private enterprise is the way forward and commercial reality is the only way to fund any improvements, taking this argument off the electrical ballot would be the best way forward for all government parties.

However it is here and here to stay, so let’s make sure we can afford these promises before we judge it to be a good idea.
Francis
Aug 11, 2010 12:11 PM
Frankly I am embarrassed that a potential leader of this country does not only not know what he is talking about but admits it.
Currently I am using Telstra cable which for the most part runs at around 30 MBs but when you get a few more people on it, it can drop down to around 10 MBs. Frankly taken on Abbott's words my current service is better than what he is offering. To be blunt we are going backwards.
Further still what about forcing Telstra to give up its broardband customers yet Optus who are not a real competitor as they don't cover the the uneconomic areas of the country so their costs are lower are let of scott free. Where is the even-handedness in that. Thank god we had engineers running the PMG etc when they built the original infrastructure and not a mob of failed Lawyers parading as politicians.
negarsalek
Aug 11, 2010 12:35 PM
I'm working on a reaction piece now with further points of view. Should be up soon...
sla73
Aug 11, 2010 12:41 PM
Ha, you guys all sound like discruntled ex-telstra / union guys.. and to boot you probally now all work for the gravey train that is NBN Co!

Just rember, not everyone are super tech geeks you you and besides we all know that Conry has no freaking idea..
gnome
Aug 11, 2010 1:20 PM

@sla73:
"ex-Telstra/union guys" - no

"work for the gravey (sic) train" - no

"not everyone are super tech geeks" - ???

"Conry has no freaking idea" - yes.

And your point is. . .?
Francis
Aug 11, 2010 1:22 PM
To Sla73
1. I have never worked for Telstra
2. Conboy seems to be making it up on the run, so we agree here
3. It was obvious that Abbott had not been properly briefed before he went on the show and he should have been.
4. Question. What are you a die hard Liberal who can not see the wood for the trees?
sla73
Aug 11, 2010 1:25 PM
Francis,
My comments inline

1. I have never worked for Telstra
OK
2. Conboy seems to be making it up on the run, so we agree here
agreed
3. It was obvious that Abbott had not been properly briefed before he went on the show and he should have been.
4. Question. What are you a die hard Liberal who can not see the wood for the trees?
sla73
Aug 11, 2010 1:32 PM
Hi Francis,
Thanks for you comments, see my in line

1. I have never worked for Telstra
Lucky you, I have heard that trying to get anything done in that place is a nightmare..

2. Conboy seems to be making it up on the run, so we agree here
Yep, NFI

3. It was obvious that Abbott had not been properly briefed before he went on the show and he should have been.
Agreed, but you also can't expect him to be a tech guru.. See previous answer and also Conboy is not the leader..

4. Question. What are you a die hard Liberal who can not see the wood for the trees?
Nope, just another voter who was taken down the garden path by labour..
johnpro2
Aug 11, 2010 1:46 PM
@sla73:
"ex-Telstra/union guys" - no ...State Rail actually which relies heavily on remote technology.
Jp
pmc777
Aug 11, 2010 2:16 PM
The Merrick Defense:

"I am not an elephant, sorry I meant Tech Head"
sla73
Aug 11, 2010 2:48 PM
State Rail.... Same diff really?
All ex public service orgnisations that are heavliy process orintated and where there is no ownership of outcomes etc...

but i digress... apploiges
Comments have been disabled for this article.
 
 
Top Stories
 
Oakton to sell Dimension Data cloud
Strategic relationship.
 
Data#3 warns of grim full year
Uncertainty in Queensland.
 
Sign up to receive CRN email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...
Latest Comments
Polls
Is your business doing as well now as it was at this time last year?


   |   View results
Yes
  32%
 
No
  54%
 
The same
  14%
TOTAL VOTES: 486

Vote now
CRN Magazine

Issue: 316 | July 2013

CRN Magazine looks in-depth at the emerging issues and developments for the channel, and provides insight, analysis and strategic information to help resellers better run their businesses.