An HP stockholder has come out swinging against CEO Meg Whitman in the lead up to the company’s annual shareholder’s meeting, questioning the newly instated chief's ability to lead the computer giant.
The outburst follows HP’s revelation that former CEO Leo Apotheker was awarded over double the compensation of Whitman in 2011, despite being fired from the top job.
HP on Friday released its annual proxy statement to investors, which in part details the company's executive compensation, including the fact that Whitman received a $US1 salary for the year along with $US16.1 million ($A14.9 million) in stock options and $372,598 in "other compensation" for a total of $16.5 million.
In comparison, Apotheker received $30.4 million for 2011, which includes about $1.2 million in salary, a $6.4 million bonus, stock awards totaling $17.7 million, and "other compensation" of $5.2 million.
However, part of Whitman's compensation included payment for her time as a member of HP's Board of Directors before she took over the president and CEO role at HP immediately after Apotheker was fired from that position.
HP in its proxy statement also outlined changes in its compensation programs which target 15 percent of the CEO's compensation to come from a target bonus and 85 percent to come from a long-term incentive award. HP's annual stockholders meeting is slated to be held on March 21.
At that meeting, HP shareholders will be asked to approve the list of proposed Board of Directors, the choice of auditing firm, and new executive compensation, all of which the company's Board of Directors support.
However, the Board is asking shareholder's to reject a stockholder proposal entitled "Executives to Retain Significant Stock." Under that proposal, senior executives would "retain a significant percentage of stock acquired through equity pay programs until one-year following the termination of their employment and to report to shareholders regarding this policy" before the next annual shareholder meeting."
John Chevedden, the shareholder who proposed the proposal, cited in the proposal third-party evidence tying long-term stock holdings for senior executives to improved corporate governance.
HP's Board responds to shareholder proposal
Chevedden accused HP of being a "stumbling Silicon Valley giant," and quoted a story in The Economist magazine which accused the company's Board "of serial ineptitude spanning the appointment and dismissal of Carly Fiorina, the firing of Mark Hurd, and the selection of Leo Apotheker."
Fiorina and Hurd, like Apotheker after them, were fired from their posts as president and CEO of HP.
Chevedden also downplayed Whitman's ability as head of HP, and wrote in the proposal that Whitman made a fortune when she took her former company, eBay, public, but "flagged badly as eBay grew into a mature business—as it became more like HP. She also failed when she tried to translate her corporate celebrity into a political career. She lost miserably despite spending $100 million of her own money. It is not clear that someone who comes from a consumer-internet background like Whitman is an ideal successor at a company that does a lot of business with other corporations."
HP's Board responded in the proxy statement by saying the company has adopted "stock ownership guidelines and other compensation policies to ensure that our executives are focused on HP's long-term success and that their interests are aligned with those of our stockholders."
HP also said that attracting and retaining qualified senior executives in a competitive marketplace requires a competitive compensation package including equity compensation, and that "imposing post-employment holding requirements could limit our ability to attract and retain executives or require us to compensate executives in other less effective ways to remain competitive."
This article originally appeared at crn.com
Issue: 303 | May
Access CRN's extensive online resources including; email bulletins, community discussions and unique online news.
A confirmation email has been sent to your email address - SUPPLIED GOES EMAIL HERE. Please click on the link in the email to verify your email address. You need to verify your email before you can log on to the CRN website or start posting comments on articles.
If you do not receive your confirmation email within the next few minutes, it may be because the email has been captured by a junk mail filter. Please ensure you add the domain '@crn.com.au' to your white-listed senders.