Nutanix completes IPO

By on
Nutanix completes IPO

After several false starts, hyper-converged infrastructure developer Nutanix completed its IPO.

And, in a time when tech IPOs have not been doing well, Nutanix's IPO stands out for a surprising opening day success.

Nutanix, which by many accounts is the leading hyper-converged infrastructure vendor, late Thursday priced its IPO at US$16 per share, which was a considerable jump from the US$11.00 to US$13.00 a share it had been expected to offer when it filed its fifth amendment to its S-1 last week with the US Securities and Exchange Commission.

Investors like what they saw in Nutanix, which trades on the NASDAQ exchange under the ticker symbol NTNX. The company's share prices opened Friday at US$26.50 per share and closed at US$37.00. Prices held at that level in after-hours trading.

Based on last week's filing, Nutanix had been expected to bring in about US$209 million. But with the higher price, albeit with a smaller than originally expected number of shares sold, the company on Friday raised about US$238 million.

Nutanix noted in last week's S-1 that Dell, which is also an OEM partner for Nutanix, could - through its acquisition of EMC - become an even stronger competitor given its leading server and now leading storage businesses.

Dell, with the EMC acquisition, gains control of VMware's VxRail and VxRack hyper-converged infrastructure technologies that compete with Nutanix.

It's expected Dell will want to combine the VxRail and VxRack software with its server hardware. Just what that might mean for the Dell-Nutanix relationship remains to be seen.

Dell was not able to comment on this question by press time.

Nutanix executives were not available on Friday to discuss the IPO. However, Nutanix chief executive Dheeraj Pandey said in a prepared statement emailed to CRN USA that Nutanix has for seven years been raising the bar for enterprise infrastructure by rethinking storage and compute for a virtualised world.

"Today’s listing marks an important milestone on our journey as we continue to revolutionise the next generation IT infrastructure and computing that will help our customers realise the full potential of the enterprise cloud," Pandey said in that statement.

In last week's S-1 filing, Nutanix said that as of 31 July it had 3768 end-user customers of its hyper-converged infrastructure system, including 3100 global, 2000 enterprises such as Activision Blizzard, Best Buy, Jabil Circuit, Kellogg, Nintendo, Nordstrom, Toyota Motor of North America, and the US Department of Defence Office of the Secretary of Defence.

The company is still on an upward growth curve. Revenue for Nutanix's fiscal year 2016, which ended 31 July, reached US$444.9 million, up from US$241.4 million in fiscal 2015 and US$127.1 million in fiscal 2014.

The company posted a loss of US$168.5 million in fiscal 2016, however, up from US$126.1 million in fiscal 2015 and US$84.0 million in fiscal 2014. As of 31 July, the company realised an accumulated deficit of US$441.9 million.

In its S-1 analysis of the competitive environment, Nutanix wrote that it operates in an "intensely competitive enterprise infrastructure market and competes primarily with companies that build and operate enterprise clouds, integrated systems, and standalone storage and servers."

Among its competitors are software providers like VMware and Red Hat; traditional IT systems vendors including Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco Systems, Lenovo Group, Dell Technologies, Hitachi Data Systems and IBM; and storage vendors such as Dell, NetApp, and Hitachi Data Systems.

Nutanix also mentioned that it relies to a "significant degree" on indirect sales channels for revenue. In the S-1, the company listed two distributors - Carahsoft Technology and Promark Technology - for a total of 38 percent of its revenue.

This article originally appeared at

Copyright © 2017 The Channel Company, LLC. All rights reserved.

Most Read Articles

You must be a registered member of CRN to post a comment.
| Register


Does the government do enough to procure from local IT providers?
View poll archive

Log In

Username / Email:
  |  Forgot your password?